|
Post by Stray on Jun 10, 2019 4:59:11 GMT -5
Update: I just posted updated files in the first post that fix an issue where OSC STR was a bit unreliable.
|
|
|
Post by lebasti on Jun 10, 2019 6:06:44 GMT -5
I'm using standard Live builds here and Log.txt will show an error if there is a problem loading the server. Out of curiosity, are you able to use X-OSCs? Ok! Yes, X-OSCs are working nicely - I use them together with macros triggered from Lemur at the moment: www.youtube.com/watch?v=lb3THh6mSOAEDIT: yeah. I used your updated files and had a first success - my test project received the proper strings
|
|
|
Post by Stray on Jun 10, 2019 17:18:55 GMT -5
Progress! Good stuff and nice setup you have there.
|
|
|
Post by lebasti on Jun 11, 2019 1:18:13 GMT -5
indeeed, thank you At the moment, everything seems to work nicely. I just have some problem with Lemur - i can't set the text of a text element, only "light" is available as a target here. Maybe it is a limitation of lemur. I wanted to display (formatted as bonus) a larger chunk of text with hints for every track on my template. Another nice thing would be to add some alias naming for bindings - because sometimes, the param names of the devices are not the easiest to check them live. At the moment, I solve this by rack macro names, but those can't be changed for every song.
|
|
|
Post by Stray on Jun 11, 2019 5:53:07 GMT -5
Good to hear! With Lemur, I think you need to use a script on the object to set its text. Something like this: Execution: On OSC Address: /control_name/name Script: setattribute(TheNameOfTheLemurObject, 'content', OSC_ARGS[0]);
Not sure I follow what you mean by aliases. Do you mean that you want to be able to translate a longer parameter name into a short parameter name? If so, I would think you could do that with scripting in Lemur.
|
|
|
Post by lebasti on Jun 14, 2019 7:37:15 GMT -5
Cool thank you Stray! I will check out this scripting thing
|
|
|
Post by stoersignal on Jun 17, 2019 2:20:50 GMT -5
could you tell me what i`m doing wrong? no osc is coming out of live. tested with OSC data monitopr and resolume. as output OSC adress i tried it with 127.0.0.1, localhost and 192.168.1.100... nothing worked..... i`ve got the feeling that i`m missing something essentially btw. i tried it with the official 10.1 release and the new beta. no difference Attachments:Debug Log.txt (13.44 KB)
|
|
|
Post by Stray on Jun 17, 2019 5:28:35 GMT -5
You're trying to send OSC to an application running on the same system as ClyphX Pro? If so, 192.168.1.100 is the IP address of the system? And is the application receiving OSC on port 9000?
|
|
|
Post by Stray on Jun 17, 2019 5:30:10 GMT -5
I was asked to post the TouchOSC template I used in the demo video, so here it is Bindings Viewer Test.touchosc (1.31 KB). Note that, in order to use it, the names of your encoders need to be k1 - k16.
|
|
|
Post by Urbi Et Orbi on Jun 17, 2019 5:46:41 GMT -5
I was asked to post the TouchOSC template I used in the demo video... I was the one who asked you for the template. Thank you very much for the quick answer. I try it as soon as I can.
|
|
|
Post by stoersignal on Jun 17, 2019 9:52:37 GMT -5
192.168.1.100 is the IP address of the system? YES And is the application receiving OSC on port 9000? YES
|
|
|
Post by rickywander on Jun 17, 2019 13:23:47 GMT -5
Very interesting everything. I am new to this arguments.. Could someone pls suggest to me one good OSC app for android that will display bindings?
|
|
|
Post by Urbi Et Orbi on Jun 17, 2019 16:31:30 GMT -5
Very interesting everything. I am new to this arguments.. Could someone pls suggest to me one good OSC app for android that will display bindings? TouchOSC has its android version, it is a simple software with nice knobs, faders and buttons. Excellent application for $5,00 (4,99 play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.hexler.touchosc_a&hl=es
|
|
|
Post by Stray on Jun 17, 2019 18:21:52 GMT -5
Welcome to the forum Urbi Et Orbi. I would second the recommendation for TouchOSC. Works great! 192.168.1.100 is the IP address of the system? YES And is the application receiving OSC on port 9000? YES Okay, I'll try to reproduce here.
|
|
|
Post by stoersignal on Jun 19, 2019 7:26:11 GMT -5
Okay, I'll try to reproduce here. So you also don`t see a obvious mistake on my side?
|
|